This post was originally published on The Future of Children blog on June 27, 2013.
By Wade C. Jacobsen
A recent article in The Atlantic
points out that US incarceration
rates are extremely high compared to those of other nations, especially for
black men. But jails and prisons represent just one of many stages in the
justice system where racial-ethnic disparity is a major problem, even for
youth. Understanding why black and Latino adolescents experience greater risk
of contact with the juvenile justice system is a difficult task. Future of Children author Alex
Piquero argues that police play an important decision-making role in juvenile
justice. Thus, careful examination of a youth's initial interaction with police
may shed some light on the issue of minority contact.
One example of police contact is New York City's Stop-and-Frisk program.
It has been practiced by the New York Police Department for decades, and many
contend that it has helped keep guns
off the street and lower the city's homicide rate. Some research shows evidence
to support this argument,
but the practice has nonetheless been met with heated debate and complaints of racial
profiling. Indeed, a recent report by the New York Civil Liberties Union
found that more than 86 percent of police
stops in 2012 were of blacks or Latinos.
To address the controversy surrounding Stop-and-Frisk, the City Council
voted today
to increase the oversight of police by establishing a new inspector general
position. Yet some fear placing more limits on police will lead to an increase
in crime rates. Piquero urges rigorous evaluation of new initiatives to curb
disproportionate minority contact, with a focus on the best evidence for what
works. Find his evidence-based suggestions in the Future of Children issue on Juvenile
Justice.

No comments:
Post a Comment